This article provides a comprehensive guide to Second Near-Infrared (NIR-II, 1000-1700 nm) window fluorescence imaging for researchers and drug development professionals.
This article provides a comprehensive guide to Second Near-Infrared (NIR-II, 1000-1700 nm) window fluorescence imaging for researchers and drug development professionals. We explore the foundational physics behind reduced scattering and autofluorescence, detail current methodologies from probe design to in vivo applications, address critical troubleshooting and optimization challenges, and validate NIR-II's superiority through comparative analysis with traditional techniques. This resource synthesizes the latest advancements to empower precise, deep-tissue biological interrogation.
Within the thesis context of advancing deep tissue fluorescence imaging, the precise definition of optical windows in biological tissue is foundational. The attenuation of light by tissue components—primarily hemoglobin, water, and lipids—creates distinct spectral regions of minimal absorption, known as "windows." Exploiting these windows, particularly the NIR-II (1000-1700 nm), is central to achieving unprecedented spatial resolution, signal-to-background ratio, and penetration depth for in vivo imaging, with direct implications for preclinical research and therapeutic development.
The following table summarizes the key characteristics, biological attenuators, and performance metrics of the primary optical windows.
Table 1: Definition and Comparison of Biological Optical Windows
| Window | Wavelength Range (nm) | Primary Attenuators (Tissue Chromophores) | Typical Penetration Depth | Effective Tissue Scattering | Key Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIR-I | 700 - 950 | Hemoglobin (Oxy & Deoxy), Melanin | 1-3 mm | High | Mature dye/quantum dot library; Standard silicon detectors. |
| NIR-II | 1000 - 1350 | Water (low absorption) | 3-8 mm | Reduced (~ λ^-0.2 to λ^-1) | Lower scattering, superior resolution & SBR. |
| NIR-IIa | 1300 - 1400 | Water (absorption peak) | Limited | Very Low | Minimal scattering for high-fidelity vascular imaging. |
| NIR-IIb | 1500 - 1700 | Water (high absorption) | Moderate (limited by water) | Extremely Low | Ultra-low background for high-contrast imaging. |
| NIR-III / SWIR | 1700 - 2200+ | Water, Lipids | Shallow (water-dominated) | N/A | Emerging window for spectroscopic tissue analysis. |
Objective: To visualize the murine cerebral vasculature using a non-targeted NIR-II fluorophore (e.g., IRDye 800CW for NIR-I, IR-1048 for NIR-II) and quantify signal-to-background ratio (SBR) and full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of vessel profiles.
Materials (Scientist's Toolkit):
Procedure:
Expected Outcome: Vessel FWHM will decrease and SBR will increase progressively from NIR-I to NIR-IIb windows, demonstrating reduced scattering and improved clarity.
Objective: To demonstrate deep-tissue surgical guidance by mapping the axillary lymph node following intradermal injection of a NIR-II nanoprobe.
Materials (Scientist's Toolkit):
Procedure:
Diagram 1: Light-Tissue Interaction Across Optical Windows
Diagram 2: NIR-II Imaging Workflow for Vascular Phenotyping
Table 2: Essential Materials for NIR-II Imaging Research
| Item | Function & Rationale | Example(s) |
|---|---|---|
| NIR-II Fluorophores | Emit light within the NIR-II window to minimize scattering/absorption. | Organic dyes (CH-4T, IR-1061), Quantum Dots (Ag2S, PbS/CdS), Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes (SWCNTs). |
| Targeted Bioconjugates | Enable molecular imaging by binding to specific biomarkers (e.g., VEGF, integrins). | Antibody-, peptide-, or aptamer-conjugated NIR-II probes. |
| InGaAs Camera | Detects photons in the 900-1700 nm range. Essential for NIR-II signal capture. | Teledyne Judson, Princeton Instruments, Hamamatsu (cooled to -80°C for low noise). |
| Long-Pass Filters | Block excitation laser light and shorter wavelength emissions to isolate NIR-II signal. | 1100 nm, 1250 nm, 1500 nm long-pass filters (Semrock, Thorlabs). |
| Dispersion Media | For safe, stable in vivo administration of hydrophobic nanoprobes. | PEG-phospholipids, F-127 Pluronic, serum albumin. |
| Tissue-Simulating Phantoms | Calibrate imaging systems and quantify performance metrics (resolution, sensitivity). | Intralipid-ink gels with tunable scattering/absorption coefficients. |
The interaction of light with biological tissue presents the fundamental challenge in deep-tissue fluorescence imaging. Within the context of advancing the Near-Infrared-II (NIR-II, 1000-1700 nm) window for imaging research, understanding the physics of scattering, absorption, and autofluorescence is critical. The NIR-II window offers significantly reduced scattering and absorption by endogenous chromophores, along with minimal autofluorescence, enabling superior resolution and penetration depth compared to visible (400-700 nm) and NIR-I (700-900 nm) imaging.
| Optical Property | Visible (e.g., 550 nm) | NIR-I (e.g., 800 nm) | NIR-II (e.g., 1300 nm) | Primary Cause |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reduced Scattering Coefficient (μs') | ~10-20 cm⁻¹ | ~5-10 cm⁻¹ | ~2-5 cm⁻¹ | Mie scattering by cellular organelles & fibers |
| Absorption Coefficient (μa) - Blood | Very High (~20 cm⁻¹) | Moderate (~0.5 cm⁻¹) | Very Low (<0.1 cm⁻¹) | Hemoglobin (Hb/HbO₂) |
| Absorption Coefficient (μa) - Water | Negligible | Very Low | Low-Moderate (rises after 1400 nm) | O-H bond overtone vibrations |
| Absorption Coefficient (μa) - Lipids | Low | Low | Moderate (peaks ~1200 nm) | C-H bond overtones |
| Tissue Autofluorescence | Very High | Moderate | Negligible | Flavins, NADH, Collagen, Elastin |
| Estimated Penetration Depth | < 1 mm | 1-2 mm | > 3-5 mm | Cumulative effect of μs' and μa |
| Theoretical Resolution at 3 mm depth | Poor (> 500 μm) | Moderate (~200 μm) | High (< 50 μm) | Reduced scattering enables ballistic photon retention |
Data compiled from recent literature on tissue phantoms and *in vivo studies (2023-2024).*
Light scattering in tissue is predominantly forward-directed (Mie-type) due to structures like mitochondria, nuclei, and collagen fibers. The scattering coefficient (μs) decreases with increasing wavelength (λ), following an approximate power law: μs' ∝ λ^(-b), where b is the scattering power (typically 0.5-2 for biological tissue). This wavelength dependence is the primary reason for reduced scattering and improved resolution in the NIR-II window.
Major absorbers in tissue define the "biological windows." Hemoglobin and melanin dominate in the visible range, water absorption increases steadily into the NIR, and lipids have specific peaks. The NIR-II window (1000-1350 nm) is uniquely positioned in a local minimum for hemoglobin, water, and lipid absorption.
Autofluorescence arises from endogenous fluorophores such as flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), and structural proteins. These molecules require high-energy (short wavelength) excitation, and their emission tails off beyond ~800 nm. The NIR-II window is virtually free from this background noise, drastically improving signal-to-background ratio (SBR).
Objective: Quantify the reduced scattering (μs') and absorption (μa) coefficients of ex vivo tissue samples in the NIR-II range.
Materials:
Procedure:
Objective: Compare penetration depth and resolution of a NIR-II fluorophore (e.g., IRDye 1200CW) vs. a NIR-I fluorophore (e.g., IRDye 800CW) in a mouse model.
Materials:
Procedure:
Diagram Title: Physics of Light in Tissue: NIR-I vs. NIR-II Pathways
Diagram Title: Workflow for Tissue Optical Property Measurement
| Item | Function & Relevance |
|---|---|
| NIR-II Fluorophores (e.g., IRDye 1200CW, CH-4T, Ag2S quantum dots) | Emit fluorescence in the 1000-1700 nm window; the core agent for generating signal with low background. |
| Tissue-Simulating Phantoms (e.g., Intralipid, India Ink, Agarose) | Mimic tissue scattering (Intralipid) and absorption (Ink); essential for system calibration and protocol validation. |
| InGaAs or HgCdTe Camera | Detects NIR-II photons; superior quantum efficiency in 900-1700 nm range compared to silicon CCDs. |
| 1064 nm or 808 nm Diode Lasers | Common excitation sources for NIR-II fluorophores; 1064 nm minimizes tissue scattering/absorption of excitation light. |
| Long-pass & Band-pass Filters (e.g., 1100 nm LP, 1200/20 nm BP) | Isolate NIR-II emission, block excitation laser light, and define specific imaging sub-windows (e.g., NIR-IIa, 1300-1400 nm). |
| Integrating Sphere Spectrophotometer | Gold-standard tool for quantitatively measuring the bulk optical properties (μa, μs') of tissue samples. |
| Index-Matching Fluids/Gels | Reduce surface specular reflections at tissue-air interfaces during ex vivo optical measurements. |
| Dedicated IAD Software | Performs inverse Monte Carlo fitting on reflectance/transmittance data to extract intrinsic optical coefficients. |
The NIR-II window (1000-1700 nm) represents a transformative modality for in vivo fluorescence imaging, directly addressing the limitations of traditional visible (400-700 nm) and NIR-I (700-900 nm) fluorescence. This application note details the core advantages that define its utility in deep-tissue research, framed within a thesis on advancing non-invasive biodistribution and pharmacokinetic studies.
1. Enhanced Penetration Depth Biological tissues exhibit significantly reduced scattering and absorption of NIR-II photons compared to shorter wavelengths. Key endogenous absorbers like water, lipids, and hemoglobin have minimal absorption coefficients in this region. This allows photons to travel deeper into tissue before being attenuated, enabling visualization of structures several centimeters deep, such as deeply seated tumors or cerebral vasculature through the intact skull.
2. Superior Spatial Resolution Reduced photon scattering in the NIR-II window mitigates the "blurring" effect prevalent in NIR-I imaging. The point spread function is tighter, allowing for the resolution of finer anatomical features. This permits high-fidelity imaging of capillary-level vasculature and precise localization of targeted contrast agents in dense tissue matrices.
3. High Signal-to-Background Ratio (SBR) A combination of factors contributes to dramatically improved SBR. The autofluorescence of biological tissues is exceedingly low beyond 1000 nm, virtually eliminating a major source of background. Concurrently, reduced scattering minimizes out-of-focus signal. This results in images with exceptional contrast, where the target signal stands out clearly against a near-black background, enabling more sensitive detection of molecular targets.
Quantitative Comparison of Optical Windows
Table 1: Optical Properties and Performance Metrics Across Fluorescence Imaging Windows
| Parameter | Visible (400-700 nm) | NIR-I (700-900 nm) | NIR-II (1000-1700 nm) | Measurement/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue Scattering | Very High | High | Low | Scattering coefficient (μs') decreases ~ λ^-α (α≈0.2-1.4) |
| Hemoglobin Absorption | Very High | Moderate | Very Low | Absorption coefficient (μa) drops by 1-2 orders of magnitude |
| Water Absorption | Low | Low | Moderate (peaks after 1400 nm) | Optimal window is 1000-1350 nm to avoid water peak |
| Tissue Autofluorescence | Very High | Moderate | Negligible | Major contributor to background in Vis/NIR-I |
| Typical Penetration Depth | <1 mm | 1-3 mm | 1-3 cm | Depth where signal drops to 1/e of original |
| Achievable Resolution | Poor (due to scattering) | ~3-5 mm at depth | <1 mm at depth | Resolution defined by FWHM of point spread function |
| Typical In Vivo SBR | Low (< 5:1) | Moderate (5-10:1) | High (10-100:1) | Dependent on probe brightness and target density |
Table 2: Performance of Representative NIR-II Fluorophores in Preclinical Models
| Fluorophore Type | Emission Max (nm) | Model System | Imaged Structure | Reported SBR | Resolution Achieved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes | 1000-1400 | Mouse Brain | Cerebral Vasculature | >50:1 | ~30 μm (through skull) |
| Quantum Dots (Ag2S) | 1200 | Mouse Hindlimb | Femoral Arteries & Veins | ~40:1 | ~50 μm at 3mm depth |
| Organic Dye (IR-FEP) | 1050 | Mouse Tumor | Subcutaneous Tumor Vasculature | ~25:1 | ~100 μm |
| Lanthanide Nanoparticles | 1525 | Mouse Abdomen | Spleen & Kidney | >100:1 | ~200 μm (whole-body) |
Protocol 1: In Vivo NIR-II Imaging of Deep-Tissue Vasculature Using Quantum Dots
Objective: To visualize the deep hindlimb vasculature of a living mouse with high resolution using Ag2S quantum dots (QDs).
Materials: See "The Scientist's Toolkit" below.
Procedure:
Protocol 2: Ex Vivo Validation of Probe Biodistribution via NIR-II Fluorometry
Objective: To quantify the accumulation of an NIR-II organic dye in major organs post-mortem, correlating with in vivo images.
Procedure:
Title: NIR-II In Vivo to Ex Vivo Workflow
Title: Core Advantages of NIR-II Window Logic
Table 3: Key Reagents and Equipment for NIR-II Imaging Experiments
| Item | Function / Role | Example Specifications / Notes |
|---|---|---|
| NIR-II Fluorophore | Contrast agent emitting in the 1000-1700 nm range. | E.g., Ag2S Quantum Dots, IR-1061 dyes, Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Must be biocompatible or functionalized for targeting. |
| NIR Laser Source | Excitation light for fluorophore. Wavelength must match probe absorption. | 808 nm or 980 nm diode lasers are common. Power density must be calibrated for animal safety (< 0.5 W/cm²). |
| InGaAs Camera | Detects NIR-II photons. Essential for signal capture. | Cooled, 2D array detector sensitive from 900-1700 nm. High quantum efficiency and low dark noise are critical. |
| Long-Pass Filters | Blocks excitation laser light and collects only emission. | E.g., 900 nm, 1000 nm, or 1200 nm long-pass filters. Optical density > 4 at laser wavelength. |
| Small Animal Anesthesia System | Maintains animal immobility and physiological stability during imaging. | Isoflurane vaporizer with induction chamber, nose cone, and oxygen supply. |
| Temperature-Controlled Imaging Stage | Maintains animal body temperature under anesthesia to prevent hypothermia. | Heated stage with feedback control, typically set to 37°C. |
| Image Acquisition Software | Controls hardware, captures, and stores time-series data. | Vendor-specific or open-source (e.g., MATLAB, Python with camera SDK). Enables ROI analysis. |
| Fluorometer (NIR-sensitive) | Quantifies probe concentration in ex vivo tissue samples. | Must include a NIR-sensitive photodetector (e.g., InGaAs) and appropriate monochromators/spectrometers. |
| Tissue Homogenizer | Prepares uniform organ lysates for ex vivo fluorometry. | Gentle mechanical homogenizer (e.g., gentleMACS) to avoid damaging tubes or creating aerosols. |
The evolution of fluorescence imaging for deep-tissue applications has been fundamentally constrained by the strong scattering and absorption of light by biological tissues in the visible (400-700 nm) and traditional near-infrared (NIR-I, 700-900 nm) windows. The discovery and development of the second near-infrared window (NIR-II, typically 1000-1700 nm) has marked a paradigm shift, offering significantly reduced scattering, lower autofluorescence, and deeper penetration.
Key Historical Milestones:
Table 1: Quantitative Comparison of Imaging Windows
| Parameter | Visible (400-700 nm) | NIR-I (700-900 nm) | NIR-II (1000-1700 nm) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue Scattering | Very High | High | Low (∝ λ^-α, α~0.2-4) | Scattering decreases with longer wavelength. |
| Absorption by Blood/H2O | High (Hb/HbO2) | Moderate | Very Low | Major absorbers (water, lipids) have minima in NIR-II. |
| Autofluorescence | Very High | Moderate | Negligible | Background signal drastically reduced. |
| Penetration Depth | < 1 mm | 1-3 mm | > 5 mm (up to cm scale) | Enables whole-body imaging in small animals. |
| Spatial Resolution | Low in vivo | Moderate | High (10-50 μm at depth) | Reduced scattering preserves spatial information. |
| Maximum Signal-to-Background Ratio (SBR) | Low | Moderate-High | Very High (often >100) | Critical for detecting faint pathological signals. |
Table 2: Evolution of NIR-II Fluorophore Platforms
| Fluorophore Class | Example Materials | Peak Emission (nm) | Quantum Yield Range | Key Advantages | Historical Development Era |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inorganic Nanomaterials | SWCNTs, Ag2S QDs, PbS/CdS QDs | 1000-1600 | 0.1-15% | Photostable, tunable emission. | Pioneering (2011-2015) |
| Rare-Earth Doped Nanoparticles | NaYF4:Yb,Er,Tm (Nd3+-sensitized) | 1500-1600 | 1-10% | Sharp emissions, long lifetime. | Expansion (2016-2018) |
| Organic Dyes & Conjugates | IR-1061, CH-4T, FDA-approved ICG | 900-1100 | 1-10% | Potential for clinical translation, faster clearance. | Translation Focus (2018-Present) |
| Donor-Acceptor-Donor (D-A-D) Dyes | Benzobisthiadiazole-based polymers/small molecules | 1000-1300 | 5-20% (in solvent) | Bright, tailorable chemistry. | Ongoing Development |
Objective: To achieve high-resolution, deep-tissue imaging of the cerebral vasculature in a murine model.
Materials: See "The Scientist's Toolkit" below. Procedure:
Objective: To perform high-resolution, low-background imaging of subcellular structures using a NIR-II-emitting organic dye conjugate.
Materials: NIR-II dye-labeled dextran (or specific targeting ligand), cultured cells, confocal microscope adapted with an InGaAs detector or NIR-II-sensitive SPAD array. Procedure:
Evolution of NIR-II Imaging Technology
NIR-II In Vivo Imaging Protocol Workflow
Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for NIR-II Imaging
| Item | Function/Description | Example(s) |
|---|---|---|
| NIR-II Fluorophores | Emit light within the 1000-1700 nm window upon excitation. | SWCNTs, Ag2S Quantum Dots, IR-1061 dye, Rare-Earth Nanoparticles (NaYF4:Yb,Er), D-A-D organic dyes. |
| Targeting Ligands | Conjugated to fluorophores to enable specific binding to biomarkers (e.g., on tumors). | Peptides (cRGD), Antibodies, Aptamers, Folic Acid. |
| Surface Coating Agents | Improve biocompatibility, solubility, and circulation time of nanoparticles. | PEG derivatives (DSPE-PEG), Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA). |
| NIR-II Excitation Source | Provides photons to excite the fluorophore. Common wavelengths are 808, 980, and 1064 nm. | Continuous-wave or pulsed diode lasers, Optical Parametric Oscillator (OPO) lasers. |
| NIR-II Detector | Captures emitted NIR-II photons. Requires sensitivity beyond silicon. | InGaAs camera (cooled), Two-dimensional InGaAs array, Single-Photon Avalanche Diode (SPAD) array. |
| Optical Filters | Block excitation laser light and isolate the desired emission range. | Long-pass filters (e.g., 1000 nm, 1200 nm, 1500 nm), Band-pass filters. |
| Phantom Materials | Used for system calibration and characterization. Mimic tissue scattering/absorption. | Intralipid suspensions, Agar gel with Indian ink. |
| Image Analysis Software | For processing, quantifying, and visualizing NIR-II image data. | ImageJ (with custom plugins), MATLAB, Python (SciPy, OpenCV), Commercial microscopy suites. |
This application note details the core instrumentation for fluorescence imaging in the second near-infrared window (NIR-II, 1000-1700 nm), a critical technological domain for advancing deep tissue in vivo research. The superior performance within this spectral region—characterized by reduced photon scattering and minimal autofluorescence—enables unprecedented resolution and penetration depth for imaging biological dynamics, tumor targeting, and therapeutic monitoring. The efficacy of the entire imaging paradigm hinges on the optimal selection and integration of three core components: excitation lasers, emission filters, and detectors.
| Laser Type | Wavelength (nm) | Typical Power (mW) | Key Advantages | Limitations | Common Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diode Laser | 808, 980, 1064 | 50 - 1000 | Cost-effective, compact, stable output | Limited to specific wavelengths, potential for tissue heating at 980 nm | Excitation of CNTs, quantum dots, small molecule dyes |
| Ti:Sapphire (Tunable) | 680 - 1300 | 100 - 3000 | Widely tunable, femtosecond pulses for multiphoton | Very large, expensive, requires expert maintenance | Multiphoton NIR-II imaging, precision spectroscopy |
| Optical Parametric Oscillator (OPO) | 400 - 2600 | 100 - 2000 | Broadly tunable, integrates with Nd:YAG lasers | Large footprint, high cost, complex operation | Flexible excitation of novel fluorophores |
| Nd:YAG (Pulsed) | 1064 | 1 - 100 (per pulse) | High peak power, excellent for time-gated imaging | Pulsed system, can be bulky | Time-resolved imaging to suppress autofluorescence |
| Detector Type | Spectral Range (nm) | Cooling Temp. | Key Metric (Typical Value) | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InGaAs Photodiode (1D) | 800 - 1700 | Thermoelectric (-20°C) | Responsivity (~1.0 A/W @ 1550 nm) | Fast, simple, low cost | No spatial resolution, requires scanning |
| InGaAs CCD Camera | 900 - 1700 | Deep Thermoelectric (-80°C) | Dark Current (~100 e-/pix/s) | Good resolution, wide field | Moderate frame rate, high cost for large arrays |
| InGaAs FPA (2D Array) | 900 - 1700 | Stirling Cryogenic (-196°C) | NEP (~1000 photons/pixel/s) | High sensitivity, fast imaging | Very high cost, requires complex cooling |
| Extended InGaAs | 400 - 2500 | Cryogenic | Quantum Efficiency (~85% @ 1550 nm) | Broad spectrum coverage | Higher dark current in SWIR range |
| Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detector (SNSPD) | 400 - 2000 | Cryogenic (<2.5 K) | Detection Efficiency (>90%), Timing Jitter (<50 ps) | Ultimate sensitivity, single-photon counting | Extreme cooling, very limited active area, extremely high cost |
| Filter Type | Function | Key Specifications | Role in System |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long-Pass (LP) Emission Filter | Blocks laser light, passes NIR-II emission | Cut-On Wavelength (e.g., 1100 nm, OD >6 @ laser line) | Placed before detector; crucial for blocking scattered excitation photons. |
| Short-Pass (SP) Filter | Blocks IR light beyond detector range | Cut-Off Wavelength (e.g., 1700 nm) | Protects detector from unwanted long-wavelength radiation. |
| Band-Pass (BP) Filter | Isolates specific emission bands | Center Wavelength & Bandwidth (e.g., 1500 ± 12 nm) | Enables spectral unmixing of multiple fluorophores. |
| Dichroic Mirror | Separates excitation and emission paths | Transition Wavelength (e.g., 1050 nm), High Reflectivity & Transmission | Steers laser to sample and emission to detector in epi-illumination setups. |
Aim: To align core components and quantify the system's sensitivity and spatial resolution for deep tissue imaging experiments. Materials:
Procedure:
Aim: To distinguish two NIR-II fluorophores with overlapping emissions using distinct excitation lasers and band-pass filters. Materials:
Procedure:
Epi-Illumination NIR-II Imaging Path
Experimental Workflow for NIR-II Imaging Thesis Research
| Item | Function in NIR-II Research | Example/Notes |
|---|---|---|
| IR-26 Dye | NIR-II fluorescence standard for quantum yield reference and system calibration. | Dissolved in D2O or organic solvents (e.g., 1,2-dichloroethane). |
| PBS/D2O Solution | Isotonic solvent for in vitro and in vivo fluorophore administration. Reduces O-H absorption in NIR-II. | Used for diluting biocompatible NIR-II probes. |
| Intralipid Phantom | Tissue-simulating scattering medium for validating penetration depth and imaging performance. | Typically 0.5-2% lipid suspension in agarose. |
| PEGylated NIR-II Quantum Dots | Bright, photostable inorganic probes for long-term vascular imaging and tumor targeting. | PbS/CdS or Ag2S QDs coated with biocompatible polymers. |
| NIR-II Organic Dyes (e.g., CH-4T) | Small molecule fluorophores for rapid renal clearance and metabolic imaging. | Often require formulation with surfactants (e.g., F-127) for in vivo use. |
| Anesthesia System (Isoflurane/O2) | For maintaining animal physiological stability during in vivo imaging sessions. | Critical for reproducible, ethical longitudinal studies. |
| Blackout Enclosure | Eliminates ambient light to maximize detection of weak NIR-II signals. | Custom-built or commercial light-tight box for the imaging system. |
NIR-II (1000-1700 nm) fluorescence imaging enables unprecedented resolution and penetration depth for in vivo biomedical research. The selection of an appropriate probe is critical and depends on the specific experimental requirements regarding brightness, biocompatibility, targeting, and clearance.
Organic Dyes: Ideal for rapid clinical translation due to potential renal clearance and simpler surface chemistry for bioconjugation. Best suited for fast, high-frame-rate vascular imaging and intraoperative guidance where toxicity and clearance are primary concerns. Quantum Dots (QDs): Offer superior brightness and photostability. Their broad absorption and narrow, tunable emission are optimal for multiplexed imaging. However, long-term toxicity due to heavy metal content and reticuloendothelial system (RES) sequestration limits their use to preclinical studies. Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWCNTs): Provide exceptional photostability and emission in the longest NIR-II sub-windows (e.g., 1500-1700 nm for maximal penetration). Their large surface area facilitates high-density functionalization. They are best for long-term, deep-tissue tracking studies but face challenges in batch-to-batch consistency and complex pharmacokinetics.
Table 1: Key Characteristics of Major NIR-II Fluorescent Probes
| Property | Organic Dyes (e.g., CH-1055) | Quantum Dots (e.g., Ag₂S) | Carbon Nanotubes ((6,5) chirality) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peak Emission (nm) | 1050-1100 | 1200-1350 | 980-1000 |
| Quantum Yield (%) | 0.3 - 5.0 | 10 - 20 | 0.1 - 1.5 |
| Extinction Coeff. (M⁻¹cm⁻¹) | ~10⁵ | 10⁶ - 10⁷ | ~10⁴ (per mg/L) |
| Stokes Shift (nm) | 150-300 | 200-400 | 200-400 |
| Photostability | Moderate | Excellent | Exceptional |
| Biodegradability | Yes | No | No |
| Primary Clearance Route | Renal | Hepatic/RES | Hepatic/RES |
| Typical Coating | PEG, peptides | PEG, lipids, polymers | PEG, phospholipids, DNA |
Objective: Attach a cRGD peptide to a NIR-II dye for targeting αᵥβ₃ integrin in tumor vasculature.
Objective: Render hydrophobic Ag₂S QDs water-soluble and functionalize with a passivating polymer.
Objective: Perform non-invasive, high-resolution imaging of the cerebral vasculature.
Table 2: Essential Materials for NIR-II Probe Work
| Item | Function & Explanation |
|---|---|
| PEGylated NIR-II Dye (e.g., CH-1055-PEG) | Core imaging agent; PEGylation improves solubility, pharmacokinetics, and reduces non-specific binding. |
| EDC / NHS Crosslinker Kit | Activates carboxyl groups for stable amide bond formation with targeting ligands. |
| DSPE-PEG₂₀₀₀ (Lipid) | A common amphiphilic polymer for encapsulating and stabilizing hydrophobic probes like QDs and SWCNTs in aqueous buffer. |
| cRGDfK Peptide | Targeting ligand for αᵥβ₃ integrin, used to functionalize probes for tumor or angiogenesis imaging. |
| Size-Exclusion Chromatography Column (e.g., Sephadex G-25) | Critical for purifying conjugated probes from unreacted small molecules. |
| Anhydrous DMSO | Solvent for organic dye conjugation reactions to prevent hydrolysis of activated esters. |
| Borate Buffer (0.1 M, pH 8.5) | Optimal pH for amine-reactive conjugation chemistry (e.g., NHS ester reactions). |
| Sterile Saline (0.9% NaCl) | Isotonic vehicle for in vivo probe administration. |
| Centrifugal Filter Unit (100 kDa MWCO) | For concentrating probe solutions and buffer exchange. |
| InGaAs Camera NIR-II Imager | Detection system sensitive in the 900-1700 nm range, essential for capturing NIR-II fluorescence. |
Decision Workflow for NIR-II Probe Selection
Aqueous Phase Transfer Workflow for Probes
Advantages of the NIR-II Biological Window
Within the context of NIR-II (1000-1700 nm) fluorescence imaging for deep tissue research, the development of targeted imaging agents is paramount. Specific delivery of NIR-II fluorophores to biomarkers of interest significantly enhances signal-to-background ratio and enables precise visualization of deep-seated pathologies. This application note details conjugation strategies for three primary targeting moieties—antibodies, peptides, and small molecules—to NIR-II fluorophores, providing protocols and comparative data to guide probe design.
The choice of targeting ligand involves trade-offs between specificity, size, pharmacokinetics, and conjugation chemistry. The following table summarizes key quantitative parameters.
Table 1: Comparison of Targeting Moieties for NIR-II Probe Conjugation
| Parameter | Antibodies | Peptides | Small Molecules |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical Molecular Weight (kDa) | 150 | 1-10 | 0.2-1 |
| Binding Affinity (Kd) | nM-pM | nM-μM | nM-μM |
| Tumor Penetration Depth | Limited (poor) | Good | Excellent |
| Blood Clearance Half-life | Days (slow) | Minutes-Hours (fast) | Minutes-Hours (fast) |
| Immunogenicity Risk | High | Moderate | Low |
| Common Conjugation Site | Lysine, Cysteine (interchain) | N-terminus, Cysteine | Amine, Carboxyl, Click handle |
| Typical Dye-to-Ligand Ratio | 1-4 | 1-2 | 1 |
This is the most common, random conjugation method, linking NHS esters on the dye to primary amines on the antibody.
Protocol:
This protocol describes a copper-free strain-promoted alkyne-azide cycloaddition (SPAAC) for defined conjugation.
Protocol:
This protocol is typical for folate-receptor targeting.
Protocol:
Table 2: Essential Materials for NIR-II Probe Conjugation
| Item | Function & Critical Note |
|---|---|
| NIR-II Fluorophore-NHS Ester (e.g., CH-1055-NHS) | Provides reactive group for amine coupling. Must be stored anhydrous, shielded from light and moisture. |
| Azido-/DBCO-Modified Ligands | Enables bioorthogonal, site-specific click conjugation without cytotoxic copper catalysts. |
| Size Exclusion Chromatography Columns (e.g., PD-10, Zeba Spin) | Critical for rapid removal of unconjugated dye from protein/antibody conjugates. |
| Anhydrous DMSO | Essential solvent for dye dissolution; water content will quench active esters. |
| UV-Vis-NIR Spectrophotometer | Required for quantification of dye labeling ratio (DOL) and concentration. |
| HPLC System with C18 Column | For purification and analysis of small molecule/peptide-dye conjugates. |
| EDC/NHS Crosslinking Kit | Standard carbodiimide chemistry for activating carboxyl groups on ligands or dyes. |
Workflow for NIR II Targeted Probe Synthesis
Targeted NIR II Imaging Pathway
Step-by-Step Protocol for In Vivo NIR-II Imaging in Rodent Models
Within the broader thesis on the NIR-II (1000-1700 nm) biological window for deep tissue fluorescence imaging, this protocol details the application of this technology in rodent models. NIR-II imaging provides superior spatial resolution, millimeter-depth penetration, and reduced autofluorescence compared to traditional NIR-I (700-900 nm) imaging, making it a transformative tool for preclinical research in oncology, neurology, and cardiovascular disease.
A curated list of essential materials for a standard NIR-II imaging experiment.
| Item | Function & Critical Notes |
|---|---|
| NIR-II Fluorophore (e.g., IRDye 800CW, CH-4T, Ag2S quantum dots, single-walled carbon nanotubes) | The imaging agent. Selection depends on target (non-specific vs. targeted), excitation/emission peaks, and biocompatibility. |
| Animal Model (Mouse/Rat) with Window/Model | Disease model (e.g., tumor xenograft, cerebral ischemia) or transgenic line expressing fluorescent protein. |
| Anesthetic System (Isoflurane vaporizer, nose cones) | For safe and stable animal immobilization during imaging. |
| Hair Removal Cream | To remove fur from the region of interest, minimizing signal scattering and attenuation. |
| Warming Pad | Maintains rodent body temperature under anesthesia to prevent hypothermia. |
| NIR-II Imaging System | Includes: 808 nm or 980 nm laser for excitation; Indium Gallium Arsenide (InGaAs) or Short-Wave Infrared (SWIR) camera; appropriate emission filters (e.g., long-pass >1000 nm). |
| Image Analysis Software (e.g., Living Image, ImageJ, custom MATLAB/Python scripts) | For quantification of signal intensity, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetic analysis. |
Aim: To visualize and quantify the biodistribution and tumor-targeting efficiency of a NIR-II-labeled probe.
Step 1: Animal Preparation
Step 2: Baseline Imaging & Probe Administration
Step 3: Time-Lapse Image Acquisition
Experimental Workflow for NIR-II Tumor Imaging
Critical parameters for experiment design and reporting.
| Parameter | Typical Range / Value | Purpose & Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Laser Wavelength | 808 nm or 980 nm | Matches fluorophore excitation. 980nm penetrates deeper but causes more tissue heating. |
| Laser Power Density | 10 - 100 mW/cm² | Balances signal-to-noise ratio with potential for tissue photodamage. Must be reported. |
| Emission Filter Cut-on | 1000 nm, 1250 nm, or 1500 nm | Defines the NIR-II sub-window. Longer cut-ons reduce scatter and autofluorescence further. |
| Camera Exposure Time | 50 - 1000 ms | Adjusted for signal strength. Longer times increase signal but risk motion blur. |
| Optimal Imaging Timepoint | 4 - 48 h post-injection | Depends on probe kinetics (e.g., rapid renal clearance vs. slow targeted accumulation). |
| Target Tumor-to-Background Ratio (TBR) | > 2.0 | A TBR > 2 is generally considered the threshold for clear visual contrast in vivo. |
| Spatial Resolution (in tissue) | ~10 - 40 µm | Can achieve sub-10µm for superficial structures; degrades with depth. |
Aim: To confirm in vivo imaging results and quantify probe uptake in organs.
Aim: To establish the pharmacokinetic profile of a new NIR-II probe.
Pharmacokinetic Phases of a NIR-II Probe
Fluorescence imaging in the second near-infrared window (NIR-II, 1000-1700 nm) represents a transformative advancement for in vivo biomedical research. Compared to traditional NIR-I (700-900 nm) imaging, NIR-II light exhibits significantly reduced scattering and autofluorescence, enabling deeper tissue penetration, higher spatial resolution, and improved signal-to-background ratios. This article details application notes and protocols for three critical areas leveraging these advantages within the broader thesis of NIR-II for deep-tissue imaging.
Objective: To visualize and quantify deep-tissue vasculature, including in the brain and hind limb, with high spatial and temporal resolution.
Research Reagent Solutions:
| Item | Function |
|---|---|
| NIR-II Fluorophore (e.g., IRDye 800CW, Ag2S QDs, SWCNTs) | Emits light in the NIR-II window for high-contrast imaging. |
| Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) | Vehicle for intravenous injection of the fluorophore. |
| Isoflurane/Oxygen Anesthesia System | For humane animal immobilization during imaging. |
| Heating Pad | Maintains animal body temperature and physiological stability. |
| Tail Vein Catheter | Enables precise intravenous bolus injection. |
Experimental Protocol:
Quantitative Data Summary:
| Metric | NIR-I Window (e.g., 800 nm) | NIR-II Window (e.g., 1500 nm) | Improvement Factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue Penetration Depth | ~2-3 mm | >5 mm | ~2.5x |
| Spatial Resolution (FWHM) | ~300 µm | ~25 µm | ~12x |
| Signal-to-Background Ratio (in brain) | ~2:1 | ~10:1 | ~5x |
Title: NIR-II Vascular Imaging Protocol Workflow
Objective: To precisely define tumor margins and monitor drug delivery kinetics in deep-tissue oncology models.
Research Reagent Solutions:
| Item | Function |
|---|---|
| Targeted NIR-II Probe (e.g., cRGD-Conjugated Ag2S QDs) | Binds to specific tumor biomarkers (e.g., αvβ3 integrin). |
| Subcutaneous/Orthotopic Tumor Model | Provides a physiologically relevant imaging target. |
| Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) Buffer | For ex vivo validation of targeting. |
| Immunohistochemistry Kit | Validates probe localization against standard biomarkers. |
Experimental Protocol:
Quantitative Data Summary:
| Probe Type | Optimal Imaging Timepoint (h p.i.) | Max Tumor-to-Background Ratio (TBR) | Tumor Penetration Depth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-targeted NIR-II Dye | 4-6 | ~3.5 | Superficial |
| Targeted NIR-II Nanoprobe (cRGD) | 12-24 | ~8.2 | >100 µm deep |
| Activatable NIR-II Probe | 2-4 (post-activation) | >12 | Variable |
Title: Tumor Targeting via EPR and Active Binding
Objective: To non-invasively map lymphatic drainage and identify the sentinel lymph node (SLN) for guided biopsy or resection.
Research Reagent Solutions:
| Item | Function |
|---|---|
| NIR-II Lymph Tracer (e.g., ICG in NIR-II, Lipo-ICG) | Fluorescent dye for lymphatic uptake and mapping. |
| 31G Insulin Syringe | For precise intradermal or subcutaneous injection. |
| Sterile Saline | For diluting the tracer if necessary. |
| Surgical Dissection Tools | For SLN excision guided by real-time imaging. |
Experimental Protocol:
Quantitative Data Summary:
| Tracer | Injection Depth | Time to SLN Visualization (s) | Signal in SLN (vs. Background) | Number of SLNs Detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICG (NIR-I) | Intradermal | 60-90 | ~4:1 | 1 (superficial) |
| ICG (NIR-II) | Intradermal | 30-60 | ~15:1 | 1-2 |
| NIR-II Nanoprobe (e.g., Ag2S) | Subcutaneous | 120-180 | >20:1 | Up to 3 (deep nodes) |
Title: Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Protocol
Within the broader thesis on the NIR-II (1000-1700 nm) window for deep tissue fluorescence imaging, this document details its application in two critical translational areas: real-time intraoperative surgical guidance and the non-invasive, quantitative monitoring of drug delivery. The superior photon penetration and reduced tissue scattering in this spectral region enable visualization of anatomical structures and biomolecular targets at depths and resolutions unattainable with traditional NIR-I (700-900 nm) imaging.
Table 1: Quantitative Comparison of NIR-I vs. NIR-II Fluorescence Imaging in Biological Tissues
| Parameter | NIR-I (e.g., 800 nm) | NIR-II (e.g., 1300 nm) | Improvement Factor & Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue Scattering | High | ~10-fold lower | Scattering coefficient (μs') scales as λ^-α; α ≈ 0.2-1.4 in tissue. |
| Autofluorescence | Moderate-High | Negligible | Dramatically reduces background, enhancing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). |
| Maximum Imaging Depth (Mouse) | 1-3 mm | 5-20 mm | Depth varies with probe brightness, tissue type, and laser power. |
| Spatial Resolution at Depth | Degrades rapidly >1mm | Maintains sub-40 μm resolution at >3mm | Due to reduced scattering, enabling precise microvasculature imaging. |
| Tissue Absorption | Significant from hemoglobin, water, lipids | Minimal in "windows" (e.g., 1000-1350 nm) | Water absorption increases sharply beyond 1400 nm. |
Table 2: Performance Metrics of Representative NIR-II Fluorophores in Vivo
| Fluorophore Type | Peak Emission (nm) | Quantum Yield (in water) | Key Application Demonstrated | Key Metric Achieved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organic Dye (CH-4T) | 1065 nm | ~0.3% | Hindlimb vasculature imaging | Frame rate: 25 fps; Resolution: ~30 μm |
| Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWCNT) | 1000-1600 nm (tunable) | 1-3% | Brain tumor margin delineation | Tumor-to-normal ratio (TNR): >5 |
| Rare-Earth Doped Nanoparticles (NaYF4:Yb,Er@Nd) | 1525 nm | ~10% (in particles) | Sentinel lymph node biopsy | Detection depth: >15 mm; Detection time: < 30 sec |
| Quantum Dots (Ag2S) | 1200 nm | 4-8% | Kidney tumor resection guidance | Real-time artery/vein differentiation |
Aim: To utilize a tumor-targeted NIR-II probe for real-time visualization of malignant margins during surgical resection in a murine model.
Materials:
Procedure:
Key Data Analysis: Calculate the Tumor-to-Background Ratio (TBR) in the pre-resection image. Histology-confirmed complete resection should correlate with the absence of focal NIR-II signal in the final cavity image.
Aim: To co-encapsulate a NIR-II fluorophore with a chemotherapeutic in a thermosensitive liposome, enabling simultaneous tracking of drug carrier accumulation and triggered release.
Materials:
Procedure: Part A: In Vitro Characterization of Release
Part B: In Vivo Monitoring
Key Data Analysis: Generate a pharmacokinetic curve from the tumor ROI NIR-II signal. A sharp signal increase during FUS indicates liposome release. Correlate the magnitude of this increase with the tumoral Dox concentration measured by HPLC.
Diagram 1: Intraoperative Tumor Resection Guided by NIR-II
Diagram 2: NIR-II Monitoring of Drug Carrier Accumulation & Release
Table 3: Essential Materials for NIR-II Guided Surgery & Delivery Studies
| Item | Function & Rationale |
|---|---|
| Targeted NIR-II Nanoprobes (e.g., cRGD-Ag2S QDs, Antibody-SWCNTs) | Provides molecular contrast. Targeting moiety (peptide/antibody) enhances accumulation at disease site, while NIR-II core enables deep-tissue imaging. |
| Co-encapsulating Thermosensitive Liposomes | Advanced drug delivery vehicle. Allows spatiotemporal co-delivery of drug and NIR-II reporter, with release triggered by mild hyperthermia. |
| Lyso-1050 or Similar Environment-Sensing Dyes | NIR-II reporter molecule whose fluorescence is quenched inside liposomes and activated upon release, providing a direct optical readout of drug release. |
| NIR-II Fluorescence Imaging System | Core hardware. Typically includes a 808 nm or 980 nm laser for excitation, long-pass filters, and a liquid nitrogen-cooled or TE-cooled InGaAs camera for 900-1700 nm detection. |
| Integrated Focused Ultrasound (FUS) System | Enables localized, non-invasive heating of tissues to trigger release from thermosensitive drug carriers (e.g., at 42°C). |
| Small Animal Heating & Anesthesia Platform | Maintains animal viability and physiological temperature during long imaging sessions and surgeries. |
| Stereotactic Surgical Instruments | Allows for precise manipulation and resection under image guidance in small animal models. |
| Calibration Phantoms (e.g., IR-806 dye in capillary tubes, tissue-simulating phantoms) | Essential for system calibration, quantifying sensitivity, determining linear range, and standardizing measurements across experiments. |
Within the context of advancing deep tissue fluorescence imaging in the NIR-II window (1000-1700 nm), researchers confront significant artifacts that compromise data fidelity. This document details the primary challenges of poor signal, autofluorescence background noise, and probe aggregation, providing application notes and standardized protocols to mitigate these issues for researchers and drug development professionals.
The following table summarizes the impact of key artifacts on NIR-II imaging parameters, based on recent literature.
Table 1: Impact of Common Artifacts on NIR-II Imaging Metrics
| Artifact | Typical Cause | Effect on Signal-to-Background Ratio (SBR) | Effect on Spatial Resolution (in tissue) | Common in Probe Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poor Signal | Low quantum yield, poor excitation efficiency | Reduction by 50-80% | Minimal direct effect | Organic dyes, certain quantum dots |
| Background Noise | Tissue autofluorescence, scattering | Reduction by 40-70% | Degradation up to 2-3x | All, but minimized with >1100 nm emission |
| Probe Aggregation | Hydrophobic interactions, serum protein binding | Reduction by 60-90% | Severe degradation due to altered biodistribution | Carbon nanotubes, aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ) dyes |
Objective: To establish baseline system performance and quantify background levels. Materials: NIR-II imaging system, black calibration slide, PBS, IR-26 dye standard.
Objective: To assess aggregation state of NIR-II probes in biological buffers and implement mitigation strategies. Materials: Probe (e.g., CH1055-PEG), fetal bovine serum (FBS), dynamic light scattering (DLS) instrument, 100 kDa filter.
Table 2: Essential Reagents for Mitigating NIR-II Imaging Artifacts
| Item | Function | Example Product/Catalog |
|---|---|---|
| NIR-II Quantum Dots (PbS/CdS) | High-quantum-yield probe for strong signal; emission tunable >1300 nm. | PbS/CdS QDs, λ_em=1550 nm |
| CH-4T PEGylated Derivative | Small-molecule organic dye with built-in PEG for reduced aggregation. | CH1055-PEG5k |
| DSPE-mPEG(5000) | Lipid-PEG conjugate for coating hydrophobic probes to prevent aggregation. | Avanti Polar Lipids, 880150 |
| IRDye QC-1 Dark Quencher | Used in control experiments to validate specific signal. | LI-COR Biosciences, 1141-01 |
| Intralipid 20% | Tissue phantom component for simulating scattering background. | Fresenius Kabi |
| Cyclohexanedione (CHD) | Reagent for suppressing liver background autofluorescence via reducing Schiff bases. | Sigma-Aldrich, 185693 |
Diagram 1: NIR-II Probe Artifact Mitigation Logic
Diagram 2: Pre-in Vivo Probe QA Workflow
Fluorescence imaging in the second near-infrared window (NIR-II, 1000-1700 nm) has emerged as a transformative modality for deep-tissue biomedical research. The reduced photon scattering and minimal autofluorescence in this spectral region enable unprecedented resolution at depths of several millimeters. However, the full potential of NIR-II imaging is only realized through meticulous optimization of acquisition parameters and post-processing techniques. This application note provides detailed protocols for optimizing the critical triumvirate of laser power, exposure time, and spectral unmixing within the context of a thesis focused on advancing deep-tissue, multiplexed imaging for drug development and pre-clinical research.
The interplay between laser power and exposure time directly dictates signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), while defining the boundary for photobleaching and potential phototoxicity. Optimal settings are probe- and tissue-dependent.
Table 1: Optimization Matrix for Key Imaging Parameters
| Parameter | Typical Range (NIR-II) | Primary Effect | Trade-off Consideration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laser Power | 10 - 200 mW/mm² | Linear increase in fluorescence signal (until saturation). | Higher power accelerates photobleaching and may cause tissue heating/damage. |
| Exposure Time | 10 - 500 ms | Linear increase in integrated signal. | Longer exposures increase motion blur and total light dose. |
| Spectral Unmixing Threshold | 0.5 - 5% of max signal | Defines detectable component; higher values reduce crosstalk. | Over-thresholding can eliminate genuine weak signals from deep tissue. |
| Recommended SNR Target | > 10 dB | For reliable detection and unmixing. | Achieved by balancing Power × Time. |
Objective: To establish the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) for a specific NIR-II fluorophore-tissue system without inducing photobleaching or damage. Materials: NIR-II imaging system (e.g., InGaAs camera, 808/980/1064 nm laser), animal model (e.g., mouse with cranial window or subcutaneous tumor), NIR-II fluorophore (e.g., IRDye 800CW, CH-4T, Ag2S quantum dots). Procedure:
Objective: To isolate the unique signal of two or more spectrally overlapping NIR-II fluorophores in deep tissue. Materials: As above, plus at least two NIR-II fluorophores with distinct emission profiles (e.g., 1050 nm peak vs. 1300 nm peak). Procedure:
I_total(λ) = a*F1(λ) + b*F2(λ) + ... + c*Autofluorescence(λ)I_total is the measured signal, F1, F2 are reference spectra, and a, b are the unmixed abundances to be solved (typically via non-negative least squares algorithm).Table 2: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for NIR-II Imaging
| Item | Function & Rationale |
|---|---|
| NIR-II Fluorophores (e.g., CH-4T, LZ-1105, Ag2S/Ag2Se QDs, Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes) | Provides emission within the NIR-II window; choice dictates brightness, stability, and functionalization chemistry. |
| Tissue-Simulating Phantoms (e.g., Intralipid, India Ink, Agarose) | Calibrates imaging depth and scattering properties; essential for system characterization and unmixing library generation. |
| Dedicated NIR-II Imaging System (InGaAs/InSb Camera, NIR Lasers, Long-pass Filters) | InGaAs cameras (900-1700 nm) are standard; requires cooling to -80°C to reduce dark noise. Optical components must be NIR-optimized. |
| Spectral Unmixing Software (e.g., ENVI, MATLAB with Image Processing Toolbox, InForm) | Performs the computational separation of overlapping spectra; critical for multiplexed imaging. |
| Sterile PBS or Formulation Buffer | For reconstitution and dilution of fluorophore conjugates to ensure biocompatibility and consistent dosing. |
Title: NIR-II Imaging Optimization Workflow
Title: Linear Spectral Unmixing Process
Within the burgeoning field of deep-tissue fluorescence imaging, the NIR-II window (1000-1700 nm) offers significant advantages, including reduced photon scattering, minimal autofluorescence, and deeper penetration. The central thesis of this research domain posits that unlocking the full potential of in vivo NIR-II imaging is contingent on the development of probes with exceptional brightness, stability, and biocompatibility. These three pillars are interdependent; a brilliant probe is ineffective if it rapidly degrades in vivo, and a stable probe is useless if it is cytotoxic or exhibits poor pharmacokinetics. This Application Note details protocols and strategies for quantifying and enhancing these critical performance parameters to advance NIR-II imaging research and drug development.
Performance evaluation of NIR-II probes requires standardized quantitative measurements. Key metrics are summarized below.
Table 1: Key Quantitative Metrics for NIR-II Probe Evaluation
| Metric | Definition / Calculation | Target Value (Exemplary) | Measurement Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brightness (ε × Φ) | Molar extinction coefficient (ε, M⁻¹cm⁻¹) × Fluorescence quantum yield (Φ, %) | > 1 × 10⁵ M⁻¹cm⁻¹·% | Protocol 2.1 & 2.2 |
| Photostability (t₁/₂) | Time for fluorescence intensity to decay to half under constant irradiation | > 300 s (at relevant power density) | Protocol 2.3 |
| Serum Stability | % of intact probe after incubation in serum (e.g., 24h, 37°C) | > 90% intact | Protocol 2.4 (HPLC/MS) |
| Hydrodynamic Diameter (Dₕ) | Effective size in physiological solution, measured by DLS | < 10 nm for renal clearance | Protocol 2.5 |
| Cytotoxicity (IC₅₀/CC₅₀) | Concentration causing 50% inhibition of cell viability | > 100 µM (high CC₅₀) | Protocol 2.6 (MTT/CCK-8) |
Objective: Determine the absorption strength of the probe.
Objective: Quantify the fluorescence efficiency of the probe relative to a standard.
Objective: Measure the probe's resistance to photobleaching under simulated imaging conditions.
Objective: Determine probe integrity in biological medium.
Objective: Characterize probe size and surface charge in solution.
Objective: Assess probe biocompatibility with mammalian cells.
Title: Probe Development and Validation Workflow
Title: Probe-Target Interaction and Signal Generation
Table 2: Essential Materials for NIR-II Probe Evaluation
| Item / Reagent | Function / Purpose | Example Product / Specification |
|---|---|---|
| NIR-II Quantum Yield Standard | Reference for calculating fluorescence quantum yield (Φ). | IR-26 (in DCM, Φ=0.05%), IR-1061. |
| NIR-II Fluorescence Spectrometer | Instrument for measuring emission spectra in the 900-1700+ nm range. | Systems with InGaAs detector array, grating monochromator, and laser excitation. |
| InGaAs Photodetector | Sensitive detector for weak NIR-II signals; essential for building custom imaging setups. | Cooled, single-point or array detectors (e.g., from Hamamatsu, Teledyne Judson). |
| Dialysis Membranes / Filters | For probe purification, buffer exchange, and serum stability sample preparation. | MWCO 3.5kDa - 100kDa dialysis tubing, 10kDa centrifugal filters. |
| CCK-8 / MTT Cell Viability Kit | Simple, colorimetric assay for quantifying cytotoxicity. | Commercial kits (Dojindo, Sigma-Aldrich). |
| Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) Columns | For separating probe aggregates from monomers, critical for DLS sample prep. | e.g., Superdex 200 Increase, Sephadex columns. |
| Phantom Materials (e.g., Intralipid) | Scattering media for simulating tissue optical properties in benchtop imaging. | 1-20% Intralipid solution in agarose. |
| Animal Serum (FBS) | Biological medium for testing probe stability in a protein-rich environment. | Heat-inactivated, sterile-filtered Fetal Bovine Serum. |
Within the burgeoning field of NIR-II (1000-1700 nm) fluorescence imaging for deep tissue research, robust data quantification is paramount. Accurate extraction of signal intensity, pharmacokinetic profiles, and biodistribution data from complex in vivo datasets is critical for advancing therapeutic development and understanding disease mechanisms. This document outlines standardized protocols and best practices for processing and analyzing NIR-II imaging data, ensuring reproducible and reliable quantification.
Raw NIR-II images require systematic pre-processing to correct for instrumental and environmental variables before quantification.
Protocol: Flat-Field Correction & Spectral Unmixing
Corrected Image = (Raw Image - Dark Average) / (Flat-Field Average - Dark Average).Consistent ROI definition is essential for comparing signals across time points and between subjects.
Protocol: Standardized ROI Definition and Intensity Extraction
SBR = (MPI_target - MPI_background) / MPI_background. Record the area (pixels or mm²) of the target ROI.Translating imaging signals into quantitative pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters requires modeling against calibration standards.
Protocol: Ex Vivo Calibration for Absolute Quantification
Data Processing Workflow for NIR-II Quantification
Employ statistical methods appropriate for the experimental design to ensure findings are robust.
Protocol: Statistical Workflow for Group Comparisons
Table 1: Core Quantitative Outputs from NIR-II Imaging Analysis
| Metric | Formula/Description | Primary Application | Typical Units |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Pixel Intensity (MPI) | Average value of all pixels within a defined ROI. | Basic signal strength measurement. | Counts per pixel (a.u.) |
| Signal-to-Background Ratio (SBR) | (MPItarget - MPIbackground) / MPI_background. | Measures specific signal contrast. | Dimensionless ratio |
| Total Flux | Sum of intensity of all pixels in the ROI. | Proportional to total fluorophore amount in the ROI. | Total counts (a.u.) |
| Area of Uptake | Area of pixels above a defined threshold. | Spatial extent of signal, e.g., tumor coverage. | mm² or pixels |
| Area Under the Curve (AUC) | Integral of the time-signal intensity curve. | Total exposure/dose delivered to tissue. | a.u. × time |
| Time to Peak (Tmax) | Time post-injection when signal intensity is maximum. | Kinetics of accumulation. | Minutes/hours |
| Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR) | (MPItarget - MPIbackground) / SD_background. | Assesses detectability against noise. | Dimensionless ratio |
Table 2: Essential Reagents & Materials for NIR-II Quantification Experiments
| Item | Function in Quantification | Example/Notes |
|---|---|---|
| NIR-II Fluorescent Probes | Biological target labeling and signal generation. | Organic dyes (e.g., CH-4T), quantum dots, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs). Must have known excitation/emission peaks. |
| Fluorescent Reference Standard | Creating flat-field images and validating system performance. | Solid epoxy blocks with IR-26 dye; stable, uniform emitters. |
| Spectrally-matched Phantom | Generating calibration curves for concentration quantification. | Tissue-mimicking phantoms (e.g., Intralipid, India ink) doped with known probe concentrations. |
| Image Co-registration Software | Aligning time-series and multi-modal images for accurate ROI tracking. | Open-source (ImageJ with TurboReg/StackReg) or commercial (Living Image, IVIS Spectrum). |
| Linear Unmixing Algorithm | Resolving signals from multiple spectrally-overlapping fluorophores. | Built into most advanced imaging systems (e.g., LICOR Pearl, Odyssey). |
| Statistical Analysis Package | Performing rigorous statistical tests on derived quantitative data. | GraphPad Prism, R, Python (SciPy/Statsmodels). |
NIR-II Signal Generation & Detection Pathway
The clinical translation of NIR-II (1000-1700 nm) fluorescence imaging agents represents a paradigm shift for deep-tissue surgical guidance, disease detection, and therapeutic monitoring. This application note delineates the critical safety assessments and regulatory strategies required to advance these novel agents from preclinical research to human trials, framed within a thesis on advancing NIR-II imaging for clinical oncology.
The safety profile is fundamentally governed by the chemical composition of the probe (organic dye, quantum dot, carbon nanotube, rare-earth-doped nanoparticle). Key risk factors include:
Quantitative understanding of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) is non-negotiable. Critical parameters include:
Despite being non-ionizing, laser safety must be rigorously addressed.
Table 1: Comparative Safety Profiles of Select NIR-II Probe Classes
| Probe Class | Example Material | Typical Coating | Hydrodynamic Size (nm) | Primary Clearance Route | Key Toxicity Concerns | Clinical Stage (As of 2024) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organic Dyes | IRDye 800CW, CH-1055 | PEG, Sulfonate | 1-2 | Renal | Low; potential for off-target binding | IRDye 800CW: Phase III (Multiple) |
| Quantum Dots | Ag₂S, PbS QDs | PEG, SiO₂, ZWitterion | 5-15 | Hepatic (RES) | Heavy metal ion leaching, long-term retention | Preclinical |
| Carbon Nanotubes | Single-walled CNTs | PEG, Phospholipid | 100-500 | Hepatic (RES) | Fiber-like pathogenicity, oxidative stress | Preclinical |
| Rare-Earth NPs | NaYF₄:Yb,Er | PEG, SiO₂ | 20-100 | Hepatic (RES) | Retention in spleen/liver, ion dissociation | Preclinical |
| Dye-Loaded Nanoparticles | ICG-loaded PLGA | Polymer (PLGA) | 80-200 | Hepatic/RES | Polymer degradation products | Early Clinical (Non-NIR-II analogs) |
Table 2: Core Elements of an Investigational New Drug (IND) Application for an Imaging Agent
| Module | Section | Critical Content for NIR-II Agent |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Admin Info | Forms, Cover Letter | - |
| 2. Summary | Overall IND Summary | Integrated overview of CMC, nonclinical, clinical plans. |
| 3. CMC | Composition, Manufacture, Controls | Detailed chemical structure, nanomaterial characterization (DLS, TEM, HPLC), stability data, impurity profiles. |
| 4. Nonclinical | Pharmacology & Toxicology | In vitro target binding; In vivo efficacy (TBR data); GLP toxicology in 2 species (rodent + non-rodent); ADME/PK with quantitative biodistribution (%ID/g). |
| 5. Clinical | Protocol, Investigator Brochure | First-in-human study protocol: dose escalation, patient selection, safety monitoring, imaging parameters. |
Objective: To quantify the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of a candidate NIR-II imaging agent in a rodent model. Materials:
Objective: To identify target organ toxicities and establish a No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level (NOAEL) for the imaging agent. Materials:
Diagram Title: Regulatory Pathway from Preclinical to FDA Approval
Table 3: Essential Reagents & Materials for NIR-II Probe Safety Assessment
| Category | Item / Solution | Function & Relevance to Safety/Regulation |
|---|---|---|
| Probe Characterization | GMP-Grade Precursors | High-purity starting materials ensure reproducible synthesis and low batch-to-batch variability, a key CMC requirement. |
| Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) Columns | For precise separation and analysis of probe aggregates vs. monomers; aggregates can alter PK and immunogenicity. | |
| Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) & Zeta Potential Analyzer | Measures hydrodynamic size and surface charge, critical for predicting clearance pathways and stability in serum. | |
| In Vitro Assays | Hemolysis Assay Kit | Quantifies red blood cell lysis, an early screen for acute material toxicity. |
| Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) Assay | Detects bacterial endotoxins; endotoxin limits are strictly regulated for injectables. | |
| Cytokine ELISA Panel (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β) | Assesses immune system activation and potential for cytokine release syndrome. | |
| In Vivo Studies | Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging System (NIR-II Capable) | Core tool for longitudinal PK, biodistribution, and efficacy studies. Requires calibration standards. |
| Isoflurane Anesthesia System | For safe and consistent animal immobilization during longitudinal imaging sessions. | |
| Sterile, Endotoxin-Free Saline/Formulation Buffers | For preparing injectable doses; avoids confounding safety signals from contaminants. | |
| Toxicology | Clinical Pathology Services (GLP-compliant) | Essential for hematology, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis in regulatory toxicology studies. |
| Histopathology & Slide Scanning Services | Provides the GLP-compliant tissue processing, staining, and expert pathological assessment required for IND. | |
| Data & Compliance | Electronic Lab Notebook (ELN) | Critical for maintaining data integrity, traceability, and reproducibility—foundational for regulatory filings. |
| Statistical Analysis Software (e.g., SAS, JMP) | Required for rigorous analysis of PK/PD and toxicology data to GLP standards. |
This application note serves as a core technical chapter in a thesis dedicated to advancing deep-tissue fluorescence imaging via the second near-infrared (NIR-II, 1000-1700 nm) window. The primary thesis posits that NIR-II fluorescence imaging offers a unique combination of resolution, penetration depth, and safety for in vivo structural imaging, complementing or surpassing established modalities. This document provides a rigorous, quantitative comparison and detailed protocols to validate this claim.
The following table synthesizes key performance characteristics of each imaging modality, highlighting the unique advantages of the NIR-II window for structural visualization of deep tissues.
Table 1: Quantitative Comparison of Structural Imaging Modalities
| Parameter | NIR-I (700-900 nm) | NIR-II (1000-1700 nm) | Ultrasound (US) | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spatial Resolution | 1-3 mm (at >5 mm depth) | 10-50 µm (superficial), < 500 µm (at 5-10 mm depth) | 50-500 µm (depth-dependent) | 50-500 µm (preclinical); 1-2 mm (clinical) |
| Penetration Depth | 1-3 mm (high scatter) | 5-20 mm (reduced scatter & autofluorescence) | Centimeters (bone obstructs) | Unlimited (whole body) |
| Temporal Resolution | Milliseconds to seconds | Milliseconds to seconds | Milliseconds (real-time) | Seconds to minutes |
| Primary Contrast Mechanism | Fluorophore emission | Fluorophore/Probe emission | Tissue acoustic impedance | Proton density, T1/T2 relaxation |
| Quantitative Ability | Moderate (affected by attenuation) | High (lower attenuation) | High (for flow/velocity) | High (for volume, diffusion) |
| Ionizing Radiation | No | No | No | No |
| Key Limitation | High tissue scattering & autofluorescence | Limited clinical probe availability | Poor bone/air penetration, operator-dependent | Low throughput, high cost, low molecular sensitivity |
Objective: To compare the deep-tissue vascular imaging capability of NIR-II vs. NIR-I fluorescence using a murine hindlimb model. Materials: NIR-II fluorophore (e.g., IRDye 800CW, after FDA approval for NIR-I, or Ag2S quantum dots for NIR-II), NIR-I fluorophore (e.g., ICG), anesthetic, hair removal cream, NIR-II imaging system, NIR-I imaging system. Procedure:
Objective: To validate NIR-II structural findings against the anatomical gold standard (MRI). Materials: Tumor-bearing mouse, NIR-II probe targeting tumor vasculature (e.g., RGD-conjugated dye), MRI contrast agent (e.g., Gd-DOTA), small animal MRI system, registration software (e.g., 3D Slicer). Procedure:
Table 2: Essential Reagents for NIR-II Deep Tissue Imaging Research
| Item | Function & Rationale |
|---|---|
| NIR-II Fluorophores (e.g., Ag2S/Ag2Se QDs, SWCNTs, Organic Dyes) | Emit in 1000-1700 nm window; reduced scattering and negligible autofluorescence enable deep, high-contrast imaging. |
| Targeting Ligands (e.g., cRGD, Antibodies, Peptides) | Conjugated to fluorophores for specific molecular imaging of structures like tumor vasculature or inflamed endothelium. |
| Indium Gallium Arsenide (InGaAs) Camera | Essential detector for NIR-II light; cooled versions required for low-noise acquisition in this spectral range. |
| Dichroic Mirrors & Long-pass Filters (e.g., 1000LP, 1500LP) | Isolate NIR-II emission from excitation laser light and from any residual NIR-I fluorescence. |
| Tissue-Phantom Materials (e.g., Intralipid, India Ink) | Mimic tissue scattering and absorption properties for system calibration and quantification protocol development. |
| MRI Contrast Agents (Gd-based) | Provide standard anatomical and functional (perfusion) reference for validating NIR-II imaging data in multimodal studies. |
Title: Thesis Framework for NIR-II Modality Comparison
Title: Multimodal Comparative Imaging Experimental Workflow
Within the broader thesis on the NIR-II window (1000-1700 nm) for deep tissue fluorescence imaging, quantifying the advantages of different imaging modalities is paramount. This document provides application notes and standardized protocols for evaluating key performance metrics—penetration depth and resolution—across prevalent biomedical imaging techniques, with a focus on establishing the NIR-II window's superior performance for in vivo applications.
The following table summarizes the typical penetration depth and resolution metrics for key imaging modalities, contextualizing the NIR-II fluorescence advantage.
Table 1: Penetration Depth and Resolution Metrics Across Modalities
| Modality | Typical Penetration Depth in Tissue | Effective Spatial Resolution | Primary Contrast Mechanism | Key Limitation for Deep Tissue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brightfield Microscopy | < 100 µm | ~200 nm | Absorption, scattering | No optical sectioning; shallow penetration. |
| Confocal Fluorescence | < 200 µm | ~200 nm | Fluorescence (VIS-NIR-I) | Scattering limits depth; phototoxicity. |
| Two-Photon Microscopy | ~500-1000 µm | ~300 nm | Non-linear fluorescence | Expensive; depth still limited by scattering. |
| Ultrasound (US) | > 10 cm | 50-500 µm | Sound wave reflection | Poor molecular specificity; low resolution deep. |
| Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | No limit | 25-100 µm (preclinical) | Nuclear spin relaxation | Low sensitivity; expensive; slow acquisition. |
| X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) | No limit | 50-200 µm | X-ray attenuation | Ionizing radiation; poor soft-tissue contrast. |
| Positron Emission Tomography (PET) | No limit | 1-2 mm | Radiolabeled tracer decay | Ionizing radiation; poor anatomical detail. |
| NIR-I Fluorescence (700-900 nm) | 1-3 mm | 1-10 mm (diffuse) | Fluorescence emission | High scattering & autofluorescence. |
| NIR-II Fluorescence (1000-1700 nm) | 3-8 mm | ~10-50 µm (FMT) | Fluorescence emission | Need for specialized detectors/contrast. |
Note: Resolutions for diffuse optical techniques (NIR-I/II) are highly system and reconstruction-dependent. NIR-II provides significantly reduced scattering and autofluorescence.
Objective: Quantify the maximum detectable depth of a NIR-II fluorophore through tissue-mimicking phantoms.
Materials:
Procedure:
Objective: Systematically compare the resolution of NIR-I vs. NIR-II fluorescence imaging through scattering media.
Materials:
Procedure:
Objective: Demonstrate superior vasculature imaging depth and resolution in a mouse model using a NIR-II contrast agent.
Materials:
Procedure:
Title: NIR-II Light Interaction with Tissue for Deep Imaging
Title: Imaging Modality Selection Logic Flow
Table 2: Essential Materials for NIR-II Deep Tissue Imaging Research
| Item | Function & Rationale | Example Product/Catalog |
|---|---|---|
| NIR-II Fluorophores | Emit light in the 1000-1700 nm window; essential contrast agents with reduced scattering. | IRDye 800CW (LI-COR), Ag2S Quantum Dots (NN-Labs), CH-4T small molecule. |
| Tissue-Mimicking Phantom | Provides standardized, reproducible scattering medium for in vitro depth and resolution calibration. | 1-2% Intralipid in agarose; commercial solid phantoms (e.g., from Gammex). |
| InGaAs or SWIR Camera | Detects NIR-II photons with high sensitivity. Silicon detectors are insensitive beyond ~1000 nm. | Teledyne Princeton Instruments NIRvana, Sony IMX990/991 SenSWIR, Xenics Cheetah. |
| 1064 nm or 808 nm Laser | Common excitation sources for NIR-II fluorophores, offering deeper penetration than visible light. | CNI Laser 1064 nm DPSS, Thorlabs fiber-coupled laser diodes. |
| Long-Pass Optical Filters | Blocks excitation and NIR-I light, allowing only NIR-II emission to reach the detector. | Thorlabs or Semrock long-pass filters (>1200 nm, >1500 nm). |
| Animal Model (e.g., nude mouse) | In vivo model for validating imaging depth, pharmacokinetics, and targeting efficacy. | Athymic Foxn1nu mice for low background in dorsal skinfold or cranial windows. |
| Image Analysis Software | For quantifying intensity vs. depth, calculating SNR, and performing 3D reconstructions. | ImageJ with custom macros, Living Image (PerkinElmer), MATLAB, Python (scikit-image). |
Application Notes
The effectiveness of fluorescence-guided surgery and diagnostic imaging is critically dependent on achieving a high tumor-to-background ratio (TBR). Conventional near-infrared-I (NIR-I, ~700-900 nm) fluorescence imaging, while an advancement over visible light, suffers from significant photon scattering, tissue autofluorescence, and limited penetration depth, often resulting in suboptimal TBR. The second near-infrared window (NIR-II, 1000-1700 nm) offers a transformative solution. Within the context of advancing deep tissue imaging research, this case study quantifies the superior TBR achievable with NIR-II probes compared to NIR-I standards.
The fundamental advantage stems from reduced scattering of longer wavelengths and a dramatically minimized autofluorescence background in the NIR-II region. This leads to clearer delineation of tumor margins and deeper visualization of lesions. Quantitative comparisons consistently demonstrate that NIR-II imaging can achieve TBR values 2- to 5-fold higher than those obtained with NIR-I agents targeting the same biomarkers, such as integrin αvβ3 or folate receptors, in murine models of breast, glioblastoma, and colon cancer.
Protocol: Comparative In Vivo TBR Measurement for NIR-I and NIR-II Fluorophores
Objective: To quantitatively compare the tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of a NIR-I dye (e.g., ICG) and a NIR-II contrast agent (e.g., IRDye800CW or a biocompatible NIR-II nanoparticle like Ag₂S quantum dots) in a subcutaneous tumor mouse model.
Materials:
Procedure:
Animal Preparation:
Baseline Imaging:
Probe Administration:
Image Acquisition & Analysis:
Table 1: Quantitative Comparison of TBR in Mouse Models
| Fluorophore | Emission Window | Target | Tumor Model | Optimal Imaging Time Post-Injection | Average TBR (±SD) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICG | NIR-I (~820 nm) | Passive (EPR) | 4T1 (Breast) | 24 h | 2.1 ± 0.3 | (Standard Benchmark) |
| cRGD-ICG | NIR-I (~820 nm) | Integrin αvβ3 | U87MG (Glioblastoma) | 24 h | 3.5 ± 0.5 | Antaris et al., 2017 |
| cRGD-IRDye800CW | NIR-I (~800 nm) | Integrin αvβ3 | U87MG (Glioblastoma) | 24 h | 4.0 ± 0.6 | Zhao et al., 2020 |
| cRGD-Ag₂S QDs | NIR-II (1250 nm) | Integrin αvβ3 | U87MG (Glioblastoma) | 6 h | 12.5 ± 1.8 | Hong et al., 2012 |
| CH1055-PEG | NIR-II (1055 nm) | Passive (EPR) | 4T1 (Breast) | 24 h | 8.3 ± 0.9 | Antaris et al., 2016 |
The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions
| Item | Function in NIR-II TBR Studies |
|---|---|
| Targeted NIR-II Nanoparticles (e.g., Ag₂S, PbS/CdS QDs, SWCNTs) | Core fluorophores emitting in NIR-II; conjugated to targeting ligands (peptides, antibodies) for specific tumor accumulation. |
| Small-Molecule NIR-II Dyes (e.g., CH1055, FD-1080) | Organic fluorophores with defined chemical structures, offering potential for clinical translation and renal clearance. |
| NIR-II Fluorescent Imaging System | InGaAs camera with thermoelectric or liquid nitrogen cooling, paired with a 808 nm or 980 nm laser for deep tissue excitation. |
| Spectral Unmixing Software | Critical for separating the specific NIR-II signal from any residual autofluorescence or other spectral contributions in vivo. |
| Tumor-Bearing Mouse Models | Essential for in vivo validation. Common models include subcutaneous (simple) and orthotopic (clinically relevant) xenografts. |
Diagram: NIR-II Mechanism for Superior TBR
Diagram: In Vivo TBR Measurement Protocol
The integration of near-infrared window II (NIR-II, 1000-1700 nm) fluorescence imaging with established clinical modalities—Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Computed Tomography (CT), and Photoacoustic Imaging (PAI)—represents a frontier in deep tissue biomedical research. Within the broader thesis of exploiting the NIR-II window for superior photon penetration and reduced scattering, this multimodal paradigm synergizes the high sensitivity and functional data of NIR-II with the anatomical precision of CT, the metabolic quantification of PET, and the hemodynamic mapping of photoacoustics. This convergence enables unprecedented longitudinal tracking of disease progression, drug biodistribution, and therapeutic response from the whole-organ down to the cellular level.
The rationale for integration is grounded in the complementary physical principles and quantitative output of each modality.
| Modality | Physical Principle | Primary Output | Penetration Depth | Spatial Resolution | Key Quantitative Metrics | Temporal Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIR-II Fluorescence | Emission from excited fluorophores (1000-1700 nm) | 2D/3D optical intensity maps | 5-10 mm (up to 2-3 cm in brain) | 10-50 µm | Signal-to-Background Ratio (SBR), Fluorescence Intensity, Kinetics | Seconds to minutes |
| PET | Detection of gamma rays from positron-emitting radiotracers | 3D radiotracer concentration maps | Unlimited (whole body) | 1-2 mm | Standardized Uptake Value (SUV), %ID/g, Binding Potential | Minutes |
| CT | X-ray attenuation by tissue | 3D anatomical density maps | Unlimited (whole body) | 50-200 µm | Hounsfield Units (HU), Volumetric data | Seconds |
| Photoacoustics | Ultrasound from laser-induced thermoelastic expansion | 3D optical absorption maps | 3-5 cm | 50-500 µm | Oxygen Saturation (sO₂), Hemoglobin Concentration, Chromophore Density | Seconds to minutes |
| Agent Name/Type | Emission Peak (nm) | Integrated Modality | Target/Application | Quantum Yield (%) | Extinction Coefficient (M⁻¹cm⁻¹) | Key Reference (Year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRDye 800CW | ~800 nm (NIR-I) | PET (⁸⁹Zr) | Anti-EGFR, Tumor targeting | ~12 | 240,000 | Zhang et al. (2022) |
| CH1055-PEG | 1055 nm | PET (⁶⁴Cu), PAI | Angiogenesis, Tumor delineation | 0.3 | 65,000 | Hong et al. (2017) |
| Ag₂S Quantum Dots | 1200 nm | CT, PAI | Lymph node mapping, Vascular imaging | 5.8 | N/A | Li et al. (2020) |
| Lanthanide-Doped NPs (Nd³⁺) | 1064 nm | PET (⁸⁹Zr) | Macrophage tracking, Inflammation | N/A | N/A | Xu et al. (2021) |
| π-Conjugated Polymer Dots | 1100 nm | PAI | Brain tumor resection, sO₂ mapping | 0.4 | >1x10⁵ | Zhu et al. (2019) |
Objective: To synthesize and characterize a core-shell nanoparticle integrating NIR-II fluorescence (Ag₂S QDs), PET radioisotope (⁶⁴Cu), and CT contrast (Au shell). Materials: Silver nitrate (AgNO₃), Sodium sulfide (Na₂S), MPA (3-mercaptopropionic acid), HAuCl₄, ⁶⁴CuCl₂, DOTA-NHS ester, PBS (pH 7.4), PD-10 desalting columns, Centrifugal filters (100 kDa). Workflow:
Objective: To simultaneously map tumor vasculature (NIR-II) and oxygen saturation (PAI) in a murine model. Materials: NIR-II polymer dots (Pdots, 1100 nm emission), IVIS Spectrum CT or equivalent NIR-II imager, Vevo LAZR or MSOT photoacoustic system, nude mice with subcutaneous tumor xenografts, isoflurane anesthesia setup, heating pad. Workflow:
Objective: To quantify the whole-body biodistribution and clearance kinetics of a dual-labeled NIR-II/PET antibody. Materials: ⁸⁹Zr-DFO-labeled NIR-II antibody conjugate (e.g., ⁸⁹Zr-DFO-IRDye800CW-anti-PDL1), Inveon PET/CT or equivalent system, NIR-II imaging system, CD-1 nude mice, dose calibrator, gamma counter. Workflow:
Multimodal Imaging Integration Workflow
Pipeline for Developing a Multimodal Imaging Probe
| Item Category | Specific Product/Example | Function & Application |
|---|---|---|
| NIR-II Fluorophores | CH1055-PEG, IR-1061, Ag₂S Quantum Dots, Lanthanide-based NPs (Er³⁺, Nd³⁺) | The core imaging agent emitting in the 1000-1700 nm window for deep tissue fluorescence. |
| Bifunctional Chelators | DOTA-NHS ester, DFB-NCS, NOTA-maleimide | Covalently link radioisotopes (⁶⁴Cu, ⁸⁹Zr) to targeting molecules (antibodies, peptides) for PET integration. |
| Targeting Ligands | Anti-EGFR (cetuximab), RGD peptides, PSMA-targeting small molecules | Confer molecular specificity to the imaging probe for targeting tumors, vasculature, or specific cell types. |
| Radionuclides | ⁶⁴Cu (t₁/₂=12.7 h), ⁸⁹Zr (t₁/₂=78.4 h), ¹²⁴I (t₁/₂=4.2 d) | PET radioisotopes compatible with biological half-lives of antibodies or nanoparticles. |
| CT Contrast Elements | Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs), Iodinated compounds (Iohexol), Bismuth Sulfide NPs | Provide high X-ray attenuation for anatomical co-registration and intrinsic CT contrast. |
| Photoacoustic Contrast | Indocyanine Green (ICG), methylene blue, conjugated polymer nanoparticles | Strong optical absorbers for generating photoacoustic signal, often used in tandem with NIR-II emission. |
| Surface Modifiers | mPEG-Thiol, DSPE-PEG(2000)-Amine, Polysorbate 80 | Improve nanoparticle biocompatibility, prolong circulation time, and reduce non-specific uptake. |
| In Vivo Imaging Systems | Bruker In-Vivo Xtreme II (NIR-II), PerkinElmer IVIS Spectrum CT, Mediso NanoScan PET/CT, VisualSonics Vevo LAZR | Integrated or sequential hardware platforms for acquiring co-registered multimodal datasets. |
| Image Analysis Software | AMIRA, 3D Slicer, Living Image Software, Vevo LAB, PMOD | Enable spatial registration, segmentation, quantification, and visualization of multimodal image data. |
The second near-infrared (NIR-II, 1000-1700 nm) imaging window represents a transformative frontier in deep-tissue fluorescence imaging. Within the broader thesis of advancing in vivo biomedical research, this technology promises unprecedented resolution and penetration depth for visualizing biological structures and molecular targets. This document assesses the current clinical readiness of NIR-II imaging platforms and agents, delineates persistent limitations, and provides detailed application notes and protocols to guide researchers and drug development professionals.
Recent advancements in fluorophore development and imaging system design have yielded significant improvements in key performance indicators. The data below summarizes the state-of-the-art as of recent literature (2023-2024).
Table 1: Performance Comparison of Leading NIR-II Fluorophore Classes
| Fluorophore Class | Peak Emission (nm) | Quantum Yield (%) | Tissue Penetration Depth (mm) | Stability (Half-life in vivo) | Key Clinical Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organic Dyes (e.g., CH1055 derivatives) | 1050-1100 | 0.3 - 5.2 | 5-8 | 2-6 hours | Preclinical |
| Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes (SWCNTs) | 1000-1400 | 0.1 - 1.0 | 10-20 | Days to weeks | Preclinical |
| Rare-Earth Doped Nanoparticles (e.g., NaYF₄:Nd) | 1050, 1300 | 5 - 15 (in particle) | 8-15 | Weeks | Preclinical |
| Quantum Dots (e.g., Ag₂S, InAs) | 1200-1600 | 10 - 25 | 10-18 | Weeks | Preclinical |
| Targeted Molecular Probes (e.g., antibody-IRDye 800CW) | ~800-900 | ~10 | 3-5 | Hours to days | Phase I/II (NIR-I/Ib) |
Table 2: Clinical Readiness Assessment Matrix for NIR-II Imaging
| Parameter | Readiness Level (1-5) | Key Limiting Factor | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imaging System Accessibility | 2 | Cost & complexity of InGaAs cameras | Benchtop systems available; portable/clinical system prototypes emerging. |
| Fluorophore Regulatory Path | 1-2 | Lack of GMP-grade agents & comprehensive toxicology | Most probes are research-grade. Biodistribution and clearance pathways not fully characterized. |
| Standardization of Protocols | 2 | Varied illumination, filters, and analysis methods | No universal phantoms or calibration standards for NIR-II. |
| Demonstrated Clinical Utility | 2 | Few first-in-human trials | Early pilot studies in image-guided surgery (e.g., biliary angiography) show promise. |
| Cost-Effectiveness | 1 | High reagent and equipment cost | Not yet competitive with ultrasound, MRI, or conventional NIR-I imaging. |
Objective: To non-invasively image deep-tissue tumor vasculature using an FDA-approved indocyanine green (ICG) dye, which exhibits tail emission in the NIR-II window.
Materials (Research Reagent Solutions):
Procedure:
TBR = Mean Intensity (Tumor ROI) / Mean Intensity (Muscle ROI).Objective: To synthesize biocompatible, water-soluble Ag₂S QDs emitting in the NIR-IIb window (1500-1700 nm) for high-contrast imaging.
Materials (Research Reagent Solutions):
Procedure:
Title: Workflow for NIR-II In Vivo Vascular Imaging
Title: From NIR-II Limitations to Clinical Adoption Pathway
Table 3: Essential Materials for NIR-II Imaging Research
| Item | Function/Benefit | Example/Notes |
|---|---|---|
| InGaAs Camera | Detects photons in 900-1700 nm range. Essential for NIR-II detection. | Teledyne Judson, Hamamatsu, or Sensors Unlimited models. Cooling reduces dark noise. |
| NIR-II Fluorescent Probes | Provides the contrast signal. Choice dictates emission wavelength and brightness. | ICG (clinical), CH1055 derivatives, Ag₂S QDs, Er³⁺-doped nanoparticles. |
| 808 nm or 980 nm Laser Diode | High-power excitation source matching probe absorption. | Must be coupled with appropriate bandpass filters to prevent camera saturation. |
| Long-Pass Emission Filters (1000, 1200, 1400 nm) | Blocks excitation and NIR-I light, isolating the NIR-II signal. | Thorlabs or Semrock filters. Using 1500 nm LPF accesses lower-background NIR-IIb window. |
| Living Image or Custom MATLAB/Python Software | For image acquisition, processing, and quantification of signal dynamics. | Critical for calculating metrics like TBR, pharmacokinetics, and 3D reconstruction. |
| NIR-Reflective/Phantom Materials | For system calibration and performance validation. | Use Intralipid phantoms or specialized films to mimic tissue scattering. |
| Dialysis Tubing (MWCO 3-50 kDa) | For purifying and buffer-exchanging nanoparticle-based contrast agents. | Ensures removal of unreacted precursors and transfer to biocompatible buffers. |
| ISOFLURANE Vaporizer & Induction Chamber | Safe and effective anesthesia for in vivo rodent imaging sessions. | Maintains stable physiological conditions for longitudinal studies. |
The NIR-II imaging window represents a paradigm shift in optical bioimaging, offering unprecedented capabilities for deep-tissue visualization with high spatial and temporal resolution. From foundational physics to validated superiority over traditional NIR-I, this technology addresses long-standing challenges in scattering and autofluorescence. While methodological advancements in probe design and protocol optimization are rapidly maturing, ongoing work in biocompatibility, quantification standards, and regulatory approval is critical for full clinical translation. The future of NIR-II lies in the development of brighter, targeted probes, integration with complementary multimodal platforms, and its evolution from a powerful research tool into a mainstay for diagnostic and intraoperative clinical imaging, ultimately enabling more precise disease understanding and therapeutic intervention.